![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
oh shit son!
User status: Offline
Location: Wales / Coventry
Posts: 2,081
|
Right first off is glucose syrop the same thing as fructose 'death' syrop is it just as bad etc..
also why do people eat raw eggs? does some protein become denatured during cooking so raw eggs have more protein in them? thanks guys |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hello.
User status: Offline
Location: Boston / Puerto Rico
Posts: 580
Age: 23
|
in answer to question B, basically yes :)
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
HANDPAW MONSTER!!!
User status: Offline
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 1,686
Age: 23
|
but then you have to worry about salmonella.
![]() |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
oh shit son!
User status: Offline
Location: Wales / Coventry
Posts: 2,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
BLAAAAARGH!
User status: Offline
Location: back in NY...
Posts: 8
Age: 21
|
A) dunno, B) cus they want to?
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hello.
User status: Offline
Location: Boston / Puerto Rico
Posts: 580
Age: 23
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
User status: Offline
Posts: 1,010
Age: 7
|
Firstly, denaturing protein does not reduce the total protein present.
Nor does it neccessarily imply anything about digestibility. As it happens, cooked eggs offer a higher bioavailability than raw. Figures vary, and I haven't seen any conclusive data, so I won't make them up. The main reason for eating raw eggs is to be hardcore, look cool, imitate rocky, etc. This is a perfectly good reason, imo, and is a big part of why I recently switched to raw. Some believe that infact raw eggs (yolks) are far more nutritious than cooked. I'll see if I can find anyone that goes into detail there. In October and November last year I ate about 850 eggs, all cooked. I stopped eating them for a couple of weeks, then around christmas started with raw - just in a glass, fork to blend it, then chug it down. I tried some scrambled eggs again the other day, and found it did not digest well at all. I have no problems with raw eggs. I currently eat 12-18 per day, normally. Try it - you needn't taste a thing, and the texture isnt that bad. Blend it briefly, so the yolks are burst, otherwise you have to really suck each yolk into your mouth, which is tense. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Middleweight
User status: Offline
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,523
Age: 24
|
Quote:
has rock_ten gone insane? I fry my eggs, don't know if that affects the nutritional value for the absolute worst but I love the taste. I don't care much about raw eggs, I'll try blending one into some random shake later and see how it feels. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hello.
User status: Offline
Location: Boston / Puerto Rico
Posts: 580
Age: 23
|
I actually agree with you, Rock_ten.
i was saying basically yes. meaning the proteins change. with more of an explanation (correct me if i'm wrong tho, it's all from memory) proteins in the whites begin in a curled up position with weak bonds. when they are cooked, the heat causes them to get agitated and "jitter around" if you will. the bonds break as they slam around and now the proteins uncurl and form bonds with other proteins that have had the same effect. but the nutritional value is the same either way, it's just more hardcore to eat em raw. and of course i've eaten em raw too, i think we all have haven't we? but i was saying it's not worth it because of the taste. might as well cook em. salmonella is mainly on the shell if i remember correctly, but i don't have a source so don't take my word for it. basically, cook them or eat them raw, it really doesn't matter. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Learning (so piss off!)
User status: Offline
Location: South Coast, UK
Posts: 167
Age: 22
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|